Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to groupestarox.com

Starox Group, holding multi-sectorielle innovante | Starox Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
epr-groupe.fr 🇫🇷
EPR GROUPE - EPR Groupe
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
bmcholdinginc.com
Accueil - BMC HOLDING INC
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
gncholding.fr 🇫🇷
Société mère - Gnc Holding
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
groupe-fdsea51.com
Accueil - Groupe FDSEA 51
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
groupefdsea51.com
Accueil - Groupe FDSEA 51
1 shared topicsbusiness
65match
groupe-fdsea51.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - Groupe FDSEA 51
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
fangagroup.com
Fanga Group: Partenaire Stratégique au Mali | FANGA GROUP
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
classebusiness.fr 🇫🇷
Des Solutions Innovantes pour Votre Succès Commercial.
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupesosea-pai.com
IEG - International Expert Group
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupeo2.com
Accueil - Groupe O2
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
cinov-iledefrance.fr 🇫🇷
Fédération Cinov Ile-de-France | Fédération Cinov Ile-de-France
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupe-jbs.fr 🇫🇷
Le Groupe JBS | Histoire | Nos entreprises | Agences
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupegid.com
Accueil - Groupe GID
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupe-pff.com
Groupe PFF
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupepff.com
Groupe PFF
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupe-hans.fr 🇫🇷
Le réseau du Groupe Hans au service de votre entreprise
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
bonjourpme.com
Le groupe de réseautage des entrepreneurs ambitieux
1 shared topicsbusiness
64match
groupe-lekama.com
Accueil - Groupe Lekama
1 shared topicsbusiness

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.