Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to groupesifor.com

Accueil | Groupe Sifor - Groupe spécialisé dans le sisal - Madagascar · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
groupe-hah.com
Groupe HAH Madagascar
1 shared topicsagriculture
66match
arise-mg.com
A-RISE Madagascar
1 shared topicsagriculture
65match
laforgegroup.com
Accueil - LAFORGE Group
1 shared topicsagriculture
65match
socopdal.com
Accueil | Socopdal
1 shared topicsagriculture
64match
greentropicsgroup.com
The Green Tropics Group - Green Tropics Group
1 shared topicsagriculture
64match
sogabafrique.com
Accueil | SOGAB Afrique
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
gropal.com
GroPal - Grower's Best Friend
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
abacogroupmalta.com
AbacoGroup Malta - Abaco Group Malta
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
grupoempagro.com
Empagro Group | Grupo Empagro
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
abacogroupuk.com
Abaco Group UK - Innovative digital solutions for a sustainable future - Abaco Group UK
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
groupebiopen.com
Groupe BiOpen
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
theutopiagroupglobal.com
The Utopia Group Global - Agriculture Recruitment FIrm
1 shared topicsagriculture
63match
theafgroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
AF Group | UK’s Leading Farm Procurement Cooperative
1 shared topicsagriculture
62match
bidecgroup.net
BIDEC group ltd
1 shared topicsagriculture
62match
groupe-agri-sas.com
Groupe Regional
1 shared topicsagriculture
62match
groupe-materiel-agri.com
Groupe Regional
1 shared topicsagriculture
62match
groupe-occasion.com
Groupe Regional
1 shared topicsagriculture
62match
farmxpertgroup.com
FarmXpert Group
1 shared topicsagriculture

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.