Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to groupedesousa.com

Accueil - Groupe de sousa · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
groupeapex.com
Accueil - GROUPE APEX
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
79match
groupe-patrignani.com
Accueil - Groupe Patrignani
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
78match
groupe-corem.com
Accueil - Groupe Corem
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
76match
groupe-lauziere.com
Accueil - Groupe Lauzière
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
74match
groupeprofex.com
Accueil | Groupe Profex
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
groupezemt.com
Accueil | Groupe Zemt Inc
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
groupegmiconstruction.com
Accueil - GMI
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
descat.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - descat
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
ematech13.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - Ematech
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
francetravaux.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - France Travaux
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
groupecm.com
Accueil - Groupe Construction Métallique (CM)
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
gimetsas.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - GIMET SAS
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
grouptradeway.com
Accueil - Titre du site
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
interventionsinistre.com
Accueil - CIS
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
philaepartners.com
Accueil - Philae Partners
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
egdc-services.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - EGDC Services
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
bmatr.com
Accueil - BMATR
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
fadem-gardecorps.com
Accueil - FADEM
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.