Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to groupechartier.com

À Propos - Groupe Chartier · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
groupeinovcon.com
À propos - Groupe INOVCON
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
groupe-cheval.fr 🇫🇷
Home - Groupe Cheval
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
groupecheval.fr 🇫🇷
Home - Groupe Cheval
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
groupekoko.com
Home - GROUPE KOKO
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
groupe-jpbrard.com
Accueil - Groupe JPBrard
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
groupe-beyer.com
Home - GROUPE BEYER
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
groupegeyser.com
Accueil - Groupe Geyser
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
groupeceleb.com
Groupe Céleb
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
groupe-andy.com
Accueil - Groupe ANDY
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
groupemonark.com
Home - Groupe Monark
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
groupe-isms.com
Groupe ISMS - Groupe ISMS
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
groupeisms.com
Groupe ISMS - Groupe ISMS
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
groupe-caddac.com
Accueil - Groupe Caddac -
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
groupedevpro.com
Groupe DevPRo
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
groupe-france-hydraulique.fr 🇫🇷
ACCUEIL - Groupe France Hydraulique
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
groupe-cebqc.com
Accueil I Groupe CEBQC
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
carrierechaffois.fr 🇫🇷
Carrières de Chaffois | Groupe Vonarx
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
groupe-audran.fr 🇫🇷
Accueil - Groupe Audran
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.