Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to groupbook.io

Groupbook | Simplifying Group Travel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
grouptravelmadesimple.com
Group Travel Made Simple
1 shared topicssports
66match
playsstar.com
| Everything Travel Related
1 shared topicssports
65match
fbpot.com
FaceBook Group Verification
1 shared topicssports
65match
themontaggroup.com
Home - The Montag Group
1 shared topicssports
65match
plaingroups.com
Plaingroups – Simple chat for teams & clubs
1 shared topicssports
65match
afcvtravel.com
AFCV Travel
1 shared topicssports
64match
5dsportsgroup.com
5D Sports Group
1 shared topicssports
64match
groundaale.com
Ground Aale | Smart Ground Management Platform
1 shared topicssports
64match
groupmatches.com
Unlocking the Power of Group Matches at GroupMatches.com
1 shared topicssports
64match
thenyteams.com
New York Teams Gear, Tickets & Travel | The NY Teams
1 shared topicssports
64match
500cpzx.com
500cpzx.com – Simplify Life with Smart Gadgets
1 shared topicssports
64match
soccersubstitues.com
Game Subby — Fair playtime made simple
1 shared topicssports
64match
coachgeorgeraveling.com
George Raveling | Official Website
1 shared topicssports
64match
gridironintel.com
HOME | Sporting Intelligence
1 shared topicssports
64match
ksgmemphis.com
KSG Kingdom Sports Group
1 shared topicssports
64match
fan-raising.com
FanRaising.com | Online Team & Group Fundraising
1 shared topicssports
64match
fanraising.com
FanRaising.com | Online Team & Group Fundraising
1 shared topicssports
63match
benchmarksmg.com
Benchmark Sports Management Group | BSMG, LLC
1 shared topicssports

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.