Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to grid-dot.com

그리드 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
56match
2nul.com
이널
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
56match
hangulssi.com
한글씨 | 글자를 그리는
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
52match
jiarchi.com
제이아이 건축사사무소
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
49match
ggcubicle.com
㈜공간큐비클
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
45match
bookillust.com
BIRTH OF ILLUSTBOOK
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
44match
dhartglass.com
대한아트글라스
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
44match
maisonkorea.com
메종코리아
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
43match
joelleflower.com
Joelle flower design studio
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
42match
bakeshirts.com
BAKESHIRTS 디자인맛집 베이크셔츠
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
42match
ggoomdesign.com
꿈디자인
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
41match
genofocus.com
가봄 | 브랜드네임·CI·BI·패키지·카탈로�·�·
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
40match
kyounghoauto.com
AMC_DESIGN
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
40match
geumsusa.com
AMC_DESIGN
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
40match
bonsigudo.com
본시구도-BONSIGUDO Landscape Architecture
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
40match
bookstudiosiot.com
시옷
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
40match
boxpang.com
boxpang – 박스제작
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
39match
jinmuk.com
진묵도예 - 한풍루에 가마를 짓다
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
39match
iwayune.com
주식회사 이와윤
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.