Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gregamato.dev

ShartsRanch · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
albertp.dev
Albert Portnoy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewtc.dev
andrewtc
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
fazevedo.dev
Filipe Azevedo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
chrishaleservices.co.uk 🇬🇧
Chris Hale Services
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ashleylavery.com
Ashley Lavery - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bmteo.com
Benjamin Teo - Full-Stack Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kylezapcic.com
Kyle Zapcic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kylecaprio.dev
Kyle Caprio | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kyrilibragimov.com
Kyril Ibragimov
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maxpetretta.com
Max Petretta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mayurathavale.com
Mayur Athavale
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.