Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to greenstraw.com

Chrissy Cowdrey, Design Strategy & Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
ariariza.com
ari ariza - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
benlister.net
Ben Lister — product designer focused on design systems
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
andyryanweir.com
Andy Weir, Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
maxminchin.com
Max Minchin · UX & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
romanmenshikov.com
Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
artempyataev.com
Artem Pyataev | Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
cliodilldesign.com
clio dill design | freelance product designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
mathewnavarro.com
Mathew Navarro - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
maxbardus.com
Max Bardus / Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
fariddayub.com
Farid Dayub — Lead Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
anotherandywong.com
Andy Wong — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
bonarsatriyo.com
Bonar Satriyo - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
ahmedrazin.me
Ahmed Razin: Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
3dseason.com
3D season – Design Studio | 3D Printing & Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
masnug.com
Masnug - Product Designer & Illustrator
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
sonishakti.com
Shakti Soni | Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
piffarettigiacomo.com
Giacomo Piffaretti – Product Designer & Graphic Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
bonfimer.com
Gabriel ✦ Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.