Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to grassfish.com

Grassfish - Digital In-store platform and consulting · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
52match
acpleadership.com
ACP CONSULTANTS (847) 824-7782 - ACP Consultants, executive coaching and leadership development
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
45match
anwayasperfectgroup.com
AnwayasPerfectGroup | Truly Perfect
2 co-citations1 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
41match
kasconinc.com
KasCon Inc | Commercial General Contractor in Columbia, MD
2 co-citations4 shared techconstruction-industry
41match
dmgroupservices.com
DM Group - Underwater inspection, maintenace and repair services
2 co-citations4 shared techlogistics-and-transportation-industry
41match
kayelnova.com
KayelNova - Business Consulting
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
40match
feboko.com
FeBoKo Consulting
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybusiness-accounting-and-finance
40match
7thstreetsolutions.com
7th Street Solutions Injection Molding & Automation Experts in Cadillac, Michigan
2 co-citations4 shared techmanufacturing-industry
40match
myorlink.com
ORLINK
2 co-citations3 shared techhealthcare-industry
40match
avenew.com
Home - Avenew
2 co-citations2 shared techconstruction-industry
39match
croninind.com
About
2 co-citations2 shared techmedia-industry
39match
bweisfeld.com
BWConsulting Group - Home
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
39match
altitudeagile.com
Altitude Agile – Natalie Davis Agile Coach
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.