similar sites

Sites similar to graham2.com

btgraham (Ben Graham) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Gitapedia · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

davege1107 (David) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

samjavner (Sam Javner) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

samueljavner.com

samjavner (Sam Javner) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AlecFritsch (Flokzy) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

agrobbin (Alex Robbin) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nullXer0 (Thomas Miller) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

GilHyeon (Gilhyeon Hong) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jkarpala (Jeff Karpala) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

byjarno (Jarno) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alexurrc18 (Alexandru C.) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

mrpasquini (Matt Pasquini) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

michaelsabo (Michael Sabo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

buyabuilding.com

glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

RyanQuey (Ryan Quey) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

claytonfuselier (Clayton) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.