Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gokce.dev

Gökçe Aynacı · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
retepy.com
Retep's
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
renegl.com
*Rgl
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ikotuncollins.com
Collins Ikotun - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
remziaknar.com
Remzi Aknar - Code & Creativity
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
anaykamat.com
Anay Kamat’s Weblog | Blog to share my thoughts and ideas on Technology, Programming, and Career
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
indexedcode.com
IndexedCode | Developer's Master Journal
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewjameskrause.com
Andrew Krause
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
area256.com
Renard.io
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
beyond-the-tutorial.com
Beyond the Tutorial
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
nathanielbritten.com
Nat's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
chico.dev
Francisco Geiman Thiesen – Passionate Algorithmist, Compiler Engineer @ Microsoft
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
imansafari.com
Blog | Your Personal Tech Insights
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
researchhubs.com
Welcome to research hubs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
sinasaeidi.com
Sina Saeidi
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
glitchbyte.io
Glitchbyte
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
imaginekitty.com
Imagine Kitty Magazine
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
andypan.me
Andy Pan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
andreadito.com
Andrea Dito — Notes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.