Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to godfroyjp.com

Godfroy JP - Entrepreneur & Builder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
kimwon.com
Kimwon - Entrepreneur & Tech Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
74match
andybacciarini.com
Andy Bacciarini — Entrepreneur & Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
74match
natello.com
Sam Natello - Entrepreneur & Digital Pioneer
1 shared topicsstartups
73match
anilmathews.com
Anil Mathews | Entrepreneur & Author
1 shared topicsstartups
73match
amirrushiti.com
Amir Rushiti - Entrepreneur & Visionary
1 shared topicsstartups
73match
charlesshumate.com
Charles Shumate | Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
asad-khan.net
Asad Khan | Entrepreneur • Founder • Brand Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
charcopa.com
Karen Charcopa — Builder, Entrepreneur, Creator
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
ankurmodi.com
Ankur Modi | Entrepreneur & Tech Leader
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
patriquemercier.com
Patriqué Mercier - Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
revelli.com
Luigi Revelli - Entrepreneur & Management Student
1 shared topicsstartups
72match
kieran.com
Kieran O'Reilly - Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
alamogordoentrepreneurs.com
United States Entrepreneurs
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
bi-entrepreneur.com
BI Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
cheerfoolz.com
Cheerfoolz - Entrepreneurship in Kids
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
4kta.com
Entrepreneur Corner - Home
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
andrewsroadmaps.com
Roadmap to Entrepreneurship
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
abhishekmall.com
Abhishek Mall — Entrepreneur • Storyteller • Media Builder
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.