Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gocza.com

Zoltan Gocza - UX design leader · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
gnvinay.com
Vinay GN — Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
sivakumarravi.com
Sivakumar Ravi — UX Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
renuxlead.com
Renuja Marshall — UX Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
dennis-ux.com
Dennis O'Neil | Product design leader
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
kimgladow.com
Kim Gladow - Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
mansoorfahmeed.com
Mansoor Fahmeed — Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
eugenebur.com
Eugene Bur | UX Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
remeshan.com
Remeshan S M | UX Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anastasiamunsell.com
Anastasia Munsell | Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
angelinaseverino.com
Angelina Severino — Brand & Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
kieronkeenan.com
Kieron Keenan — Product Designer & Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
annaarteeva.com
Anna Arteeva — Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
chaseelliottclark.com
Chase Elliott Clark, Austin Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
manthandesai.com
Manthan Desai - Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ikowilson.com
i.ko Wilson • Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
simondelgiudice.com
Simon Del Giudice - UX Design Leader/Director.
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
denislirette.com
Denis Lirette | Design Leader & Accessibility Professional
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
designbykalere.com
Kalere Adele Payton - UX Design - Home
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.