Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gnvinay.com

Vinay GN — Design Leader · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
kimgladow.com
Kim Gladow - Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
gocza.com
Zoltan Gocza - UX design leader
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
sivakumarravi.com
Sivakumar Ravi — UX Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
dennis-ux.com
Dennis O'Neil | Product design leader
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
kieronkeenan.com
Kieron Keenan — Product Designer & Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
renuxlead.com
Renuja Marshall — UX Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
ikowilson.com
i.ko Wilson • Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anastasiamunsell.com
Anastasia Munsell | Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
aakarlabs.art
Aakar Labs — Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andpon.com
Andrzej Poniatowski — Product Designer & Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
designarmy.com
Home — Design Army
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
pazitto.com
Pedro Pazitto — Design Leader & Director of Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anmolarora.me
Anmol Arora — Design Lead at District by Zomato
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
singchun.com
Singchun — Design Practice of Co Tran
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
eugenebur.com
Eugene Bur | UX Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
kifuliak.com
Dmytro Kifuliak — Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
teppohaste.com
Teppo Haste | Design Leader from Helsinki, Finland
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
amrdarwish.com
Amr Darwish — Art Director & UX/UI Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.