Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gnagel.com

Glenn Nagel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
adamnengland.com
Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
glennespinosa.com
Glenn Espinosa | Musings of a software artisan
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
camerondoyle.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Doyle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
chazarvizu.com
Chaz's Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
khanakat.com
Fernando Calmet
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
bgasparotto.com
bgasparotto - Software Engineering
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewls.com
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bhanuxhrma.com
Bhanu Sharma - Software engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
go-left.com
go-left.com — Software Engineering Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
goatslacker.com
goatslacker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
singerworks.com
SingerWorks
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
artofcode.info
Art of Code Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anisuzzamanbabla.com
Anisuzzaman Babla
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
igorpopov.io
Igor Popov
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
skanderjabouzi.com
Skander Jabouzi — Programming Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pavlepaunovic.com
Pavle Paunović | JavaScript Software Engineer & Guitar Teacher | Serbia
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.