Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to gettinggui.com

getting gui · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
ismaelcelis.com
Ismael Celis
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
rfranz.com
rfranz.com | Programming Notes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mokiros.dev
Mokiros's Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
sunshinejr.com
Programming adventures by sunshinejr
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
sharptoothcode.com
Simpl Logic Cookbook
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
moltenc.com
Evolved C programming language | Molten C
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mohanarjun.com
Arjun Mohan
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
itprogramminghq.com
IT Programming HQ: Resources for programmers who are getting started.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
moduletux.com
Moduletux
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
moduletux.dev
Moduletux
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pntutorials.com
PnTutorials - Database & Programming Tutorials
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
plccoder.com
PLCCoder.com - PLC programming at a higher level
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
essentialguidelines.com
Essential C#: Coding Guidelines
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
callumscode.com
Dynamic types in Haskell - Callum's Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
dinhle.com
Dinh
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
dinhvle.com
Dinh
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
shiftingbytes.com
Shifting Bytes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andreih.com
programming, career and life
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.