Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to getmails.app

Planka · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
89match
axyboard.com
PLANKA
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
planupp.com
PlanUpp
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
plant-ops.com
PlantOPS
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
planctons.com
planctons
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
avanka.com
Avanka
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
plantedmi.com
Planted MI
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
pinomembers.com
Pino - Member Management Software | Pino
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
escapeoverseer.com
Escape Overseer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bnbmax.com
bnbMax - accommodation management software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
aivaex.com
Tobin Blank
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
lun-it.com
Lun IT
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
plannorium.com
Plannorium
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
agilerails.com
AgileRails.com - For Sale | Appraise.net Marketplace
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
planabit.com
Planabit
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
defensaq.com
Plane | Simple, extensible, open-source project management tool.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
getedgeofglory.com
Plane | Simple, extensible, open-source project management tool.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
agazzy.com
Plane | Simple, extensible, open-source project management tool.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
epaltask.com
Plane | Simple, extensible, open-source project management tool.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.