Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to georgina.dev

Georgina / Frontend Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
noye-dev.com
noye | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
erkamyaman.dev
Erkam Yaman | Frontend developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
avastack.dev
Ava Stack | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
axelrasmussen.com
Axel Rasmussen | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
keiyamagata.com
Kei Yamagata | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
gilic.dev
Marko Gilic | FrontEnd Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nurdanvayni.com
Nurdan — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
satodd.com
Sarah Todd | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
opeabiodun.com
0pedev · Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
onigirinik.com
Nikita — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
awaisdev.com
Muhammad Awais — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
epinetov.com
Vsevolod Epinetov — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
deborabucci.com
Débora Bucci — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
nxndi.com
Nxndi - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ntindev.com
Tin Nguyen | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ericcwong.com
Eric Wong | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aakashpai.com
Aakash Pai - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aldamuhaxhiri.com
Alda Muhaxhiri | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.