Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to geofflepard.com

TanGental | Writing, the Universe and whatever occurs to me · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
51match
jeanleesworld.com
Jean Lee's World – Writer of Young Adult Fantasy
3 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
51match
hadleybooks.com
Hadley Books – The Best Leaders Are Readers
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
51match
ladyofmind.com
A Lady of Mind's Observations | A Writer by many names, A Lady of Mind among them all…
3 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
50match
janegarland.com
Jane Garland, Author – What is reality, other than an old familiar story?
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
45match
mglenari.com
M.G. Lenari – writing, blogging, books
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
44match
daniellecolbertbooks.com
Danielle Colbert – The writing journey…
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
44match
almafenter.com
Alma Wallace Fenter – Writing that Inspires Love, Laughter, and even Tears
3 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
44match
elinorgale.com
Elinor Gale – Writer of Fiction, Poetry, and Memoir
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
44match
chelseavoulgares.com
Chelsea Voulgares | Writer / Editor
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
43match
joeyaholic.com
(non)sense – unidentified written object
3 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
43match
jessicahuamani.com
More of the same, but different.
3 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
43match
jameshoddinott.com
James W Hoddinott | Author, blogger and his musings
3 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.