Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gemapublishing.com

GeMa Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
batterseapublishing.com
Battersea Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
78match
kp-pub.com
KP Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
78match
cooldogpublishing.com
Cool Dog Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
78match
eudaimoniapublishing.com
Eudaimonia Publishing -
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
76match
maharapublishing.com
Beranda | Mahara Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
campusatoz.com
Campus A to Z Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
7thmindpublishing.com
7th Mind Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
nyobzoopublishing.com
Nyob Zoo publishing website
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
cambridgescholars.com
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
gapublish.com
Golden Anchor Publishing Company
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
becomepublishing.com
Become Publishing Website
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
howtheeuworks.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - John Harper Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
magesoul.com
Home | Magesoul Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
hekatepublishing.com
Hekate Publishing & Orphan Paper Imprint
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
antillamaster.com
Antillamaster Publishing Bookstore
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
espiritcreations.com
Espirit Creations & Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
kotopublishing.com
KotoPublishing – KotoPublishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
oceanpublisher.com
Home | Ocean Publisher
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.