Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to geekathon.dev

geekathon · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
moltauto.ai
autos hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
sushihackathon.com
Sushi Hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
bearpeak.ai
Human AI Partnership | BearPeak Technology
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
oacp-agora.com
OACP — The Open Agent Communication Protocol
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
oceantechhackathon.org
Ocean Tech Hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
garageinference.com
Garage Inference — Hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
beacon-bio.org
Beacon Biosignals
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
reysergio.com
Sergio Rey
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
moment.com
Moment | The AI Operating System for Investment Management
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
eudaimolabs.com
Eudaimo Labs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
superwebtricks.com
Showeblogin - SuperWebTricks
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
molaris.ai
Molaris AI Innovations
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
cai-et.com
CAI&ET - Center for AI & Emerging Technologies
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
revradar.io
revradar.io | GTM 2.0
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
8glabs.ai
8glabs AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
oceantimemachine.com
Ocean Time Machine
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ganetar.com
Ganetar AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
krakenai.io
Kraken / AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.