similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to gebecke.com

Start · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

cornelius-back.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

eternal-memoria.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

gedankenkrieger.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aufmupf.at 🇦🇹

Anderswelt Start

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

prolibris.at 🇦🇹

proLIBRIS.at | Startseite

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

wenn-nicht-jetzt.de 🇩🇪

Startseite - WNJ Verlag

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Startseite | Arena Verlag

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Start - Frank Bürger

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

innverlag.at 🇦🇹

Innverlag | Startseite

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Sven Ulrich - STARTSEITE

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

web-appearance.de 🇩🇪

annasworte - Startseite

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cameo-verlag.com

CAMEO Startseite - Cameo Verlag

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cameoverlag.com

CAMEO Startseite - Cameo Verlag

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Start - www.hej-texte.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

diegoldenelesestunde.at 🇦🇹

Home: Die goldene Lesestunde

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Text & Dialog | Startseite

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

buechereiservice.at 🇦🇹

Büchereiservice - Startseite

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.