Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gdtfoto.com

GDT Gesellschaft für Naturfotografie e.V. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
guitarsandmandolins.com
FOTOGRAFIE
2 shared topicsnature
70match
abenteuer-naturfotografie.com
Abenteuer Naturfotografie - Startseite
2 shared topicsnature
69match
poelking.de 🇩🇪
Fritz & Gisela Pölking, Naturfotografie / Nature Photography
2 shared topicsnature
66match
petermalus.com
Peter Malus – Naturbilder – Meine Natur- und Landschaftsfotografie
2 shared topicsnature
65match
martindas.com
Martin Das - Wildlife & Nature Photography
2 shared topicsnature
64match
pro-natur-fuerth.de 🇩🇪
Start - pro-natur-fuerth.de
2 shared topicsnature
63match
inspiration-natur.com
Idee - Inspiration Natur
2 shared topicsnature
32match
pro-igel.de 🇩🇪
Pro Igel e.V. - Informationen zum Igel, Igelschutz und Igelhilfe
1 shared topicsnature
32match
pflanzen-plus.com
Startseite- Pflanzen plus Buch, Jetzt Bestellen!
1 shared topicsnature
32match
insects-austria.com
Insects Austria
1 shared topicsnature
32match
pilzfreunde-mainfranken.de 🇩🇪
Pilzfreunde Mainfranken e.V.
1 shared topicsnature
31match
passeirer.de 🇩🇪
Passeirer Gebirgsziegen
1 shared topicsnature
31match
pflanz-und-tier.de 🇩🇪
pflanz-und-tier.de - Die Pflanz- und Tierforscherseite von Fabian
1 shared topicsnature
31match
profuchs-hessen.de 🇩🇪
Der Rotfuchs -
1 shared topicsnature
31match
pilzsoftware.de 🇩🇪
Pilzseite von Klaus Bornstedt
1 shared topicsnature
31match
phytoliebe.com
phytoliebe -
1 shared topicsnature
31match
pilz-und-kraut.de 🇩🇪
Pilz und Kraut - pilz-und-kraut.de
1 shared topicsnature
30match
bergziegenschnecke.net
Bergziegenschneckes Blog – Mein Projekt
1 shared topicsnature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.