Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gavinclive.com

Gavin Clive · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
gavinhall.com
Gavin Hall
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
gavinguo.com
Gavin Guo
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
gavinmcnamee.com
Gavin McNamee
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
gavin-white.com
Gavin White Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
gavinostheimer.com
Gavin Ostheimer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
kpravin.com
Pravin Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
ansin-c.com
Ryo Tanaka — Frontend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rianibm.com
Riani BM | UX Engineer Indonesia
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
shinotoshi.com
Shin Chima
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mohanveraitch.com
Mohan Veraitch | Design Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
calincohan.com
Home - Calin Cohan
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
hendrasadewa.com
Hendra Sadewa - Web Engineer | Senior Web Developer in Indonesia
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andiwp.com
AndiWP — Web Developer - Laravel
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
moesaid.com
Mohamed S Abdrabou — Full Stack Developer in Cleveland
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rhuanlucas.dev
Rhuan Lucas
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
andigoh.com
Andi Goh - Full Stack Developer & UI/UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
gautierrollin.com
Gautier Rollin | Frontend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
angubvuhtech.com
A&A Developers | Graphics & Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.