Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to garyjaypool.com

Gary Jay Pool | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
caitlinupshall.com
Home | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
richardneer.com
Richard Neer | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
rick-burnett.com
Rick Burnett | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
susanbiggar.com
Susan Biggar | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
annebabb.com
Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
camkingsley.com
Cam Kingsley | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
cameronmcwhirter.com
Cameron McWhirter | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pleasantkanu.com
Pleasant Kanu – Marketing | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
shellyoria.com
Shelly Oria | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
annamarieneill.com
Annamarie Neill | Author and Librarian
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
cakewithnonna.com
Carmela Bruno | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
anniequinnwrites.com
Annie Quinn | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
maceecarson.com
Macee Carson | Author | Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧
Carolyn Ellis | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
sheillajones.com
Sheilla Jones | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bculverjr.com
bculverjr – Author Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
susiehbaxter.com
Susie H Baxter | Author and teacher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
angelalgold.com
Angela L Gold | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.