Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gardners.com

Gardners - Gardners Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
koabooks.com
Koa Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
antennabooks.com
Antenna Books - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
kneewallbooks.com
Knee Wall Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
pixiecovers.com
Pixie Covers - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
geekygeckobooks.com
Home - Geeky Gecko Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
mactaba.com
Bookapy
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
poettibooks.com
Poetti Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kojbooks.com
Koj Books - Craig Brownlie and Koj Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
discriminatemedia.com
Discriminate Media | Small-Press Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
digitobooks.com
Digito Books | The EBooks Marketplace
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
booklabs.co.uk 🇬🇧
BookLabs - Book Production
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
isbn-us.com
ISBN Book Database
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
2hourbooksystem.com
Write In 2 Hours - Free Ebook
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
calliseditora.com
Callis | children's book publisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
pixeledtech.com
Pixel Edtech – Global eBook Seller | Academic Books Online
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
hesperianpress.com
Hesperian Press Real Australian Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
shhalaj.com
Shhalaj Publications | Books, Knowledge & Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
gatchobooks.com
HOME | GatchoBooks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.