Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to gamersi.dev

Simon gamersi: Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
anthonydierkes.com
Anthony's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
71match
annop.dev
My Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
71match
anucha.dev
anucha.dev — Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
bearded-developer.com
Bearded Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
kobesapijn.dev
Kobe Sapijn
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
georgesopov.com
George Sopov - Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
mohamadkassab.com
Mohamad Kassab
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ankitlohar.com
Developer Terminal
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
shauryasrc.com
Shaurya Choudhary - Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anishde.dev
Anish De | Fullstack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
restpen.com
Restpen - Developer's Pool
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andyhinkle.com
Andy Hinkle | Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
knileshh.com
Nilesh Kumar | Backend Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
cadenlund.com
Caden Lund | Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
connorvoigt.com
Connor Voigt - Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ethansaba.com
Ethan Saba - Computer Science Student & Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
gavinbates.dev
Gavin Bates - Programmer & Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
konyrtai.com
Alibek Konyrtai - Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.