Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gamedesignweek.com

Game design Week · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
pablocasellas.com
Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
eggchanted.com
Game Design | Eggchanted
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
owenbassdesign.com
Owen Bass – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
button-masher.net
Andrew Weldon: Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
reflectivegamedesign.com
Reflective Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
julianstables.com
Julian Stables Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
thalesrebelo.com
Thales Rebelo - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
bwgamedesign.com
Bryce Williams | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
simonhalliday.com
Simon Halliday – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
carlfarra.me
Carl Farra | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
carstenwenning.com
Carsten Wenning – A Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
judhalpin.com
Jud Halpin / Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
rebeccarreeves.com
Rebecca Reeves Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
theartofgamedesign.com
The Art Of Game Design – Schell Games
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
burakkurkcu.com
Burak Kürkçü | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
eganomicon.com
Eganomicon – Video Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
calebwharton.com
Caleb Wharton – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.