Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to galwd.com

GWD · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
47match
hawrani.com
-
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
47match
marcusbatuhan.com
SkG
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
44match
apmsmarthub.com
APM
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
42match
jmccanada.com
JMC
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
42match
hodopedia.com
-
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
41match
kenshinhub.dev
web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
41match
jjwelding.com
-
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
41match
greatmind.dev
web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
41match
apiaryplus.com
web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
41match
dhalp.com
web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
41match
gen2plank.com
Web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
40match
malikdillon.com
M
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
40match
jinishaventures.com
/
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
40match
jitendradhital.com
kit
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
40match
hialvo.com
Web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
40match
hitorigroup.com
Web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
40match
bazanmultiservices.com
Web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development
40match
greatlakes-solutions.com
Web
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.