Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gabrieldebure.com

Gabriel de Bure - CV · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
alxckn.com
Alexandre Chakroun | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andrewshamah.com
Amichai Shamah
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
pabloce.com
PabloCSE - CV
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewjohnson.dev
Resume - Andrew A. Johnson - Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
aminamani.net
Resume - Full Stack Developer - Amin Amani
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lrsoftwaredesign.com
Portfolio - Luis Ruiz
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
regisrouyard.com
Régis ROUYARD Resume | Régis ROUYARD Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ecaslai.com
Ecas Lai — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
luizlelis.com
👨🏽‍💻 Luiz Lelis · Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
atlasfinds.com
Abdulmalik Ibrahim - Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
2mio.com
Artem Poliukhovych | CV
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexej-liebenthal.dev
Alexej Liebenthal - Engineering & Beyond
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ebukaojiba.com
Ebuka's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
sinahemmati.com
Sina | Profile
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
aakashx.dev
Aakash Kamal
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
luanpablo.com
Luan Pablo - full stack developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
pablocarrillo.com
Pablo Carrillo CV
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ashishsharma.me
Ashish Sharma | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.