Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gabrielbirman.com

Gabriel Birman's Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
bugswriter.com
bugswriter's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
home-planets.com
Home Planets . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ – My personal websites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
muhammedalidogan.com
Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
mtnkenney.com
Matt Kenney | Matt’s personal website.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
carsonharrell.com
Carson Harrell
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
simartin.dev
Simon Martin's website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
bytedecoder.me
Rodrigo Reyes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
anhthongtran.com
Thong Tran
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
bsalinas.com
Ben Salinas
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
mrgrossman.com
MATTHEWGROSSMAN - Matthew Grossman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
pamelakaercher.com
PamelaKaercher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
accountpowered.com
Arman's Portal — notes, comparisons, experiments
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
julianloiacono.com
Julian's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
theshapeofstories.com
Archive | the Technopessimist
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
crachel.com
crachel | Personal website of Craig Rachel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
jslenis.com
Jeffry Lenis Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
redinzide.com
RedInzide website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
simonwoodtli.com
Simon's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.