Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to gabel.ai

Rob Gabel | Vibe Coding Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
alexgrimm.dev
Personal Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
act-two-vibe.com
Vibe Coding
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
eddycodes.com
portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
hoganmok.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
abnermolina.com
Abner's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
albertxlynch.com
Albert Lynch Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
achvc.com
achvc.com — Alvin Chai Vibe Coding
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
loujvaughn.com
Lou Vaughn's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
2daysnews.net
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
builtbyseb.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
padar.dev
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
burkholder.io
Dean Burkholder - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
fudgemillionaire.com
Gabriel Catalfo - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ebenezerkouakou.com
Ebenezer Kouakou | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
acodingduck.com
A coding duck
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alfredscyriac.com
Alfred Siby Cyriac's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
creative-coding.com
Creative Coding
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.