Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fvaldata.com

Fernando Valdata | Software Developer .NET · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
jvohub.com
JvoHub | Software developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
holarafa.io
Rafa | developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
alejandrolinares.dev
Alejandro Linares • Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
angelcruz.dev
Angel Cruz · Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ozwen.com
Ozwen - Software Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
mgdsoftware.es 🇪🇸
MGDSoft developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
albertomoya.dev
Alberto Moya Alonso | Senior Backend Developer & Software Architect
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
juanquintanilla.com
Juan Carlos Quintanilla | Software Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
juliodaza.com
Julio Daza | Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
fromdevdiego.com
Facundo | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
jscsoftwarehouse.com
JSC Software House
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
juanpablosanchez.com
Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
creamostusitiooapp.com
Creamos tu sitio o app - Software Agency
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
jruizdeveloper.com
JRuizDeveloper
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
abrahamcordoba.com
Abraham Córdoba Pérez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
juanbeloso.com
Juan Beloso - Freelance Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
juanozuna.com
Juan Ozuna — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
byyiro.dev
ByYiro - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.