Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to furtado.dev

tfurtado (Tiago Furtado) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
reedo.dev
reedo (Reedo) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
reederror.com
reedo (Reedo) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
buiko.com
helsus (Ivan Buiko) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
jussilind.com
juzzlin (Jussi Lind) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
jsunsoft.com
jsunsoftware (Beno) · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
reduq.io
remadisson (Max) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
remadisson.dev
remadisson (Max) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
juanu.dev
JuanuMusic (Juanu) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
a-bethel.net
AlexBethel (Alex Bethel) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
loscwy.com
loscwy · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
maatko.dev
maatko (Matko) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
buldakov.org
v1ctor (Victor Buldakov) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
parsebyte.com
parsebyte · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
bzzy.io
Nuxy · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bzzy.com
Nuxy · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
agileos.net
agileos · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
cortari.com
Cortari · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
lukevo.com
datvm (Luke Vo) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.