Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to fundingstack.com

CRM for Capital Raising for VCs, PE, Investment Bankers | Fundingstack · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
52match
doerscircle.com
Home - Doerscircle | Freelancers & Independent Doers
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorybusiness
51match
growwithafosto.com
Best headless ecommerce platform for retailers | Afosto
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybusiness
48match
hustlememo.com
HustleMemo
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorybusiness
48match
galeton.com
Welcome to DiVal Safety Equipment
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybusiness
46match
burhum.com
Ragi Yaser Burhum | Ragi Burhum
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorystartups
45match
domainfund.com
DomainFund - Tokenized Domain Investment DAO
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
44match
hyperkereviews.com
Hyperke Reviews - Client Reviews and Testimonials for Hyperke Growth Partners
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorysales
44match
mybitfolio.com
Bitfolio Academy | The Intelligence Layer for Web3 Leaders
3 shared tech2 shared categorybusiness
44match
healthcareuiux.com
Healthcare UIUX - Best Practices for Healthcare User Experience Design
3 co-citations3 shared techhealthcare-industry
43match
itamargero.com
Itamar Gero | Advisor, Investor & Speaker - Philippines
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
43match
itamar.com
Itamar Gero | Advisor, Investor & Speaker - Philippines
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
43match
fvcxo.com
FVCXO — The verified room for founders, VCs, and CXOs
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorystartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.