Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fundagrup.com

Anasayfa - FUNDA GRUP · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
abpenerji.com
Anasayfa - ABP TDS
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
abpgsi.com
Anasayfa - ABP TDS
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
hikayapi.com
Anasayfa - Hika Yapı
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
asyaliplastik.com
Anasayfa
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
ebainsaat.com
Anasayfa
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
loreninsaat.com
Anasayfa
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
bulutlarinsaat.com.tr 🇹🇷
Anasayfa
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
blueyatirim.com.tr 🇹🇷
Anasayfa - Blue Yatırım
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
saracinsaat.com.tr 🇹🇷
Anasayfa - Saraç İnşaat
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
altinbagvinc.com
Anasayfa - ALTINBAĞ VİNÇ
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
karadenizhazirbeton.com.tr 🇹🇷
Anasayfa - Karadeniz Hazır Beton
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
ideal-yapi.com.tr 🇹🇷
Anasayfa | İdeal Yapı
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
abkainsaat.com
Anasayfa | Abka İnşaat
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
sibainsaat.com
Anasayfa - Siba İnsaat A Ş -YOL YAPI
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
bseyapiinsaat.com
Ana Sayfa - BSE İnşaat
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
rbsinsaat.com
Ana Sayfa - RBS İnşaat
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
yapicelik.com.tr 🇹🇷
Ana Sayfa - Yapı Çelik
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
salmainsaat.com.tr 🇹🇷
Salma İnşaat | Anasayfa
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.