Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fuckingreference.com

Fucking Stuff · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
justfuckingusego.com
Just Fucking Use Go
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
fuckingswiftui.com
Fucking SwiftUI - Cheat Sheet
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
juliapixel.com
Julia's stuff!
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
albertlatacz.com
Making software happen…
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
100daysofswift.org
100 Days of SwiftUI – Hacking with Swift
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
jsmackin.com
JSMackin
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
jsfuckery.com
JSFuckery
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
actionjoin.net
ActionJoin - Fostering computational thinking
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
jstorimer.com
Working With... - Jesse Storimer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
jslipi.com
JSLipi — Programming as a way of thinking
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simchagreenbaum.com
My Coding Journey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewkluttz.com
Andrew's Coding Lab
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simplygoodcode.com
Simply Good Code – Hi I'm Luis and I've been making software for over a decade.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
0xcoders.com
0xCoders: Level up your programming skills
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
atweimer.com
According to Weimer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simshadows.com
simshadows
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
buildingblocksjava.com
Building Blocks Java
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
cpspal.com
CPS – Creative Programming Solutionns
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.