Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fttern.com

F. T. Tern, Author and Photographer - Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
reginabergen.com
Regina Bergen, Author - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
acharrison.com
A.C. Harrison, Author - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
loredamiller.com
LOREDA MILLER - AUTHOR - HOME
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
msjen.com
Jenifer Hanen - artist, author, designer, photographer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
annieseaton.net
ANNIE SEATON AUTHOR - HOME
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
juliewetzel.com
Julie Wetzel - Author - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
bryanteague.com
Bryan Teague - Author - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
rebeccajwarner.com
Rebecca Warner Author - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
redbillbailey.com
Bill Bailey - Author - Homepage
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
rebeccahardyauthor.com
Rebecca Danese Photography - Rebecca Hardy - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
tg-sparks.com
T.G. Sparks – Author and playwright
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
judemandell.com
Jude Mandell author - Biography
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
jrcreaden.com
JR Creaden – Author and Editor
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
jrleckman.com
Author J.R. Leckman - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
annemontgomerywriter.com
Author Anne Montgomery
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
simonlaffy.com
Simon Laffy – Author and musician
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
andrewdyhin.com
Andrew Dyhin – Author and innovator
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
pamelagossiaux.com
Pamela Gossiaux – Author and Speaker
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.