Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ftrain.com

Ftrain, by Paul Ford · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
avipaul.dev
Avi Paul
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
ftrainlabs.com
Home - FTrain
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
luapmartin.com
Paul MARTIN
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
bostick.io
Paul Bostick
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
tomotanzo.com
TomoTanzo - The AI Soul Forge
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lorientai.com
LorientAI - The Vercel for Model Training
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
oxbridgeandco.com
Oxbridge & Co. | AI tools and training for SMBs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
3mat.net
VMadm Blog
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
aerial-perspectives.net
About AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
bmfx.ai
BMFX.ai - Generative AI Apps, GPTs, and Agents
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
bmfx.net
BMFX.ai - Generative AI Apps, GPTs, and Agents
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
tomkelly.com
TomKelly
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
autremachine.com
Autre Machine
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
cosmonited.com
Arthur Khessin's blog — Thoughts, stories and ideas.
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
theaiinevitable.com
The AI Inevitable
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
myaipal.ai
My AI Pal - Train Your Own AI Buddy
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
atseeds.com
AI Curriculum & Training for Schools
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
textseeds.com
AI Curriculum & Training for Schools
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.