Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ft4users.com

FT4 Users Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
acug.org
Coal Users' Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
70match
lotus-infra.com
Lotus Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
69match
3zgroups.com
3Z Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
69match
ehgroup.dev
EH Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
68match
hmcygroup.com
HMC Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
68match
evcgroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
EVC Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
68match
brymosgroupllc.com
Brymos Group LLC
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
68match
edclgroup.com
EDCL Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
68match
reeepgroup.com
REEEP GROUP
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
67match
7fusers.org
Power Users Group 7F Users Group - Power Users Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
67match
3rdgencapi.com
3rd Gen Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
atlas-teknoloji.com
ATLAS GROUP TECHNOLOGY
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
cpigroupltd.com
CPI Group Ltd.
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
fueldispenserpump.com
Welldone Group
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
mrigroupe.com
MRI – Groupe
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
mr-international.com
MRI – Groupe
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
edan-group.com
Edan Group Int.
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry
66match
advancedenergybuyersgroup.org
Advanced Energy Buyers Group (AEBG): Home
1 shared topicspower-and-energy-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.