Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to froghack.com

FROGHACK · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
edgehackathon.com
EDGE Hack
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
junhaochai.com
Jun Hao Chai
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
sisyphism.com
AI Hack Labs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
365scores.app
365AI Hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
abtinmu.com
Abtin Mogharabin
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
frogpodai.com
Home - Frog Pod AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
frogorama.com
Frogorama Gallery
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
buildforafrica.org
Build For Africa AI Hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
echohack.app
Echohack Industries
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
frogdiction.com
Frogdiction - $FDTN
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
2apac.com
2apac.com - Oviedo, FL
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
mov-axbx.com
Building WOPR: A 7x4090 AI Server
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
sinceai.app
Since AI — Hackathon Platform
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
frogylive.com
Frogy LIVE - Stream your Life
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
100agents.dev
100 Agents | AI Agents Hackathon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
frogcode.dev
FrogCode - Leap Frog Your Competition
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
juliusai.dev
JuliusAI - MetaPhase Hackathon 2025
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
loopfrog.dev
Loopfrog | AI-guided Product Development
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.