Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to forum.se

Bokförlaget Forum – En del av Bonnierförlagen · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
20match
haparandabladet.com
Haparandabladet.se
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
20match
mantera.com
Hem - Måntera
2 co-citations5 shared techconstruction-industry
20match
growpipes.com
Vertical Farming Solutions - Growpipes
2 co-citations4 shared techagriculture
18match
jajja.com
Vi driver rätt trafik till din webbplats - Jajja!
2 co-citations4 shared techmarketing-and-advertising
18match
heartofevangelism.com
Välkommen – Hjälp oss hjälpa! – Heart of Evangelism
2 co-citations6 shared technon-profit-organizations
18match
lagerprodukter.com
Produkter & möbler för industri & verkstad | Lagerprodukter.com
2 co-citations3 shared techmechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
17match
hammarviken.com
Investmentbolag i Göteborg – vi utvecklar företag långsiktigt | Hammarviken
2 co-citations3 shared techprivate-equity
17match
heliairsweden.com
Ett komplett helikopterföretag! - HeliAir Sweden
2 co-citations4 shared techaviation-industry
17match
gudruns.com
Gudruns - förstklassig och hållbara kött- och charkprodukter producerade av svensk råvara
2 co-citations5 shared techfood-industry
17match
mictecada.com
Mictecada – PROJECT MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING
2 co-citations3 shared techmanagement-consulting-industry
17match
isakssons.com
Isakssons Rostfria AB - Rostfritt, Byggplåt & Miljöteknik
2 co-citations4 shared techconstruction-industry
17match
jajjamediagroup.com
Vi driver rätt trafik till din webbplats - Jajja!
2 co-citations4 shared techmarketing-and-advertising

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.