Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to firebolt.io

Firebolt: The Analytical Database for Engineers · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
48match
layerbase.com
Serverless and Managed Databases for over 20 Engines | Layerbase
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydatabases
47match
chiakitakeda.com
Chiaki Takeda - Data Engineer
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydatabases
44match
hadoona.com
Hadoona - Simplify your geospatial data
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydatabases
43match
adinarayanan.com
Adi Narayanan | Database Engineer & AI Systems
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydatabases
42match
andurillabs.com
Anduril Labs | Data Infrastructure & Analytics Solutions
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydatabases
42match
elfrontend.com
ElFrontend · Arcade Edition
4 co-citations3 shared techprogramming-languages
41match
ankadata.org
Anka Data
2 shared tech2 shared categorydata-storage-and-warehousing
41match
hqkumo.com
Kumo.ai | Predict Anything on Relational Data in Seconds
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
41match
bytekumo.com
Kumo.ai | Predict Anything on Relational Data in Seconds
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
41match
calonanalytics.com
Backbone by Calon | Data foundations for consumer goods teams
1 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorydata-storage-and-warehousing
41match
adityamalkar.com
Aditya Malkar | Data Scientist & ML Engineer
2 co-citations3 shared techartificial-intelligence
40match
cyware.com
Cyware - AI-Powered Threat Intelligence Platform | Home
3 co-citations3 shared techinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.