Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to findafresh.com

Findafresh Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
admorepublishing.com
Admore Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
robeth.com
Robeth Publishing, LLC
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bitebackpublishing.com
Biteback Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
7thangelpublishing.com
7th Angel Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
socopublishing.com
SoCo Publishing, LLC
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
bluerupert.com
Blue Rupert Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
bradleypublishing.com
Bradley Publishing Inc.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
8magpies.com
Eight Magpies Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
7firespublishing.com
Home | 7 Fires Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
agelesswisdompublishing.com
Ageless Wisdom Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
bickeringowls.com
Bickering Owls Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
4cpublishing.com
4C Publishing - 1553773860
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pioneerpublishinggroup.com
Store - Pioneer Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bellacraftspublishing.com
Home - Bella Crafts Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
boavistaeditions.com
Boavista Editions | Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
dmjammes.com
Lavender & Moonstone Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dolphinkhouse.com
Dolphink House | Digital Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
nevalorpublishers.com
Nevalor Publishers
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.