Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to files.com

Managed File Transfer, SFTP & File Sharing — Files.com · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
91match
customcname.com
Managed File Transfer, SFTP & File Sharing — Files.com
3 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorycloud-computing
63match
itsahmadawais.com
Awais Ahmad | Backend & AI Systems Engineer
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
53match
nafie.dev
Staff Software Engineer & Tech Lead | Mostafa Nafie
3 co-citations3 shared techtechnology-and-computing
53match
gabrielhauss.com
Gabriel Hauss
3 co-citations3 shared techweb-development
52match
nestdatagroup.com
Nest Data Group | Enterprise Data Architecture & IT Solutions
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorydata-storage-and-warehousing
52match
dagploy.com
Sovereign AI Infra, Deployed in Minutes - Dagploy.com
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorycloud-computing
51match
myriadcara.com
Myriadcara | Cloud, DevOps, Security & Managed Services
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorycloud-computing
51match
cybermem.dev
CyberMem - Persistent Memory for Your AI
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
51match
halimlab.com
Khaled Halim Lab — Educational Engineering Projects
3 co-citations2 shared techrobotics
51match
allyciahorn.com
Allycia Horn — Portfolio
3 co-citations2 shared techweb-development
50match
dominiconduty.com
Dominic On Duty | Software Engineer, Data Analyst & STEM Educator
3 co-citations2 shared techtechnology-and-computing
50match
anhcodes.dev
Anh Chu — Data Engineer & Architect
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorycloud-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.