Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fikbug.com

the cold brew cache · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
61match
8luma.com
8luma — Sticky Notes & Annotations for the Web | Chrome Extension
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
addonschrome.com
Chrome Extensions | Boost Your Browser Experience | Addons Chrome
2 shared topicsbrowsers
60match
bluestormtech.com
BST Home
2 shared topicsbrowsers
60match
clickablenotes.com
Harvest Clickable Notes - Chrome Extension
2 shared topicsbrowsers
60match
feedfabrique.com
Feed Fabrik - Modern RSS Feed Reader Browser Extension
2 shared topicsbrowsers
60match
feedfabrik.com
Feed Fabrik - Modern RSS Feed Reader Browser Extension
2 shared topicsbrowsers
60match
feedfabriek.com
Feed Fabrik - Modern RSS Feed Reader Browser Extension
2 shared topicsbrowsers
60match
roblang.com
Rob Lang
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
36match
neurospark.io
Andrew Casper
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
guidecache.com
GuideCache
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
therealdavidcole.com
The Cole Archive — David A. Cole
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
andrewcline.dev
Andrew Cline
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
andrewcchang.com
Andrew Chang
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
andrewcotter.io
andrew cotter
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
favpix.com
Cached Memory
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
andrewchidden.com
Andrew Chidden
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
benburghart.com
The Conditions of Listening
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
34match
3minutelegal.com
Write the check
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.