Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fieldborne-tech.com

Fieldborne Tech · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
dodukh.com
D&D Tech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
inteligencetech.com
Intelligence Tech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kvvrtech.com
KVVR Tech
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
software-technology.org
Software Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kxlconsulting.com
Sample Tech Provider
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rhodestech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Rhodes Tech
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
adadora.net
Adadora Tech
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
mcbeetech.com
McBee Technical Solutions
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
softwaretechnologiesllc.com
Software Technologies LLC
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
armantechpro.com
Arman TecH Pro
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
pineapple.dev
Pineapple Technologies Inc
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
bigeye.me
Bigeye's techlog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ksxtec.com
KSX Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
ksxtech.com
KSX Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
dnaktechnologies.com
DNAK Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
doji-tech.com
Doji Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softtechexpress.com
Soft Tech Express
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
code-time.com
Code Time Technologies | Next Generation RTOS
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.