Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fhackett.com

Finn Hackett: About · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
cobolmutant.com
About Us
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mauroleggieri.com
About Me
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
maximedefauw.com
Maxime Defauw - About
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kuniwak.com
About Kuniwak
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bhsshackathon.dev
BHSS Hackathon
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nextdoorhacker.com
NextDoorHacker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bentnib.org
About - Bob Atkey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
gregwiechec.com
Grzegorz Wiecheć - Blog about programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
solhack3rs.com
Solana Student Hackathon
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
newrustacean.com
New Rustacean: A Podcast About Learning Rust
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
softwaretrickery.com
Programming | All About that Programmin'
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
asciicasts.com
About Index Info | asciicasts
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
phpweekly.com
PHP Weekly. News, Articles and more all about PHP
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codeblogmoney.com
Code Blog Money - Blog about Coding and Making Money
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ashscodingclub.com
GhostHacks
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
coderolls.com
Coderolls | A blog about Java and related technologies.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
theswiftdev.com
Articles about application development - The.Swift.Dev.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codemaker4.com
CodeMaker_4
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.