Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to femvenner.com

femvenner GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
ott-computer.de 🇩🇪
OttComputer GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ottcomputer.de 🇩🇪
OttComputer GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
albos.biz
albos computer gmbh
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
smartreco.com
RecoScript GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
q5software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
q5-software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kpro-software.com
KPro Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
s-food.de 🇩🇪
Sinner Datenservice GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
sfood.de 🇩🇪
Sinner Datenservice GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
olas-software.de 🇩🇪
OLAS GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
2prod.net
2PROD GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
phoenix-computer.de 🇩🇪
© PHOENIX Computer GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rubin-consulting.de 🇩🇪
rubin consulting GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
sqservice.de 🇩🇪
SQService GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
socogmbh.de 🇩🇪
soco Software & Computer GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
sourcery.de 🇩🇪
Sourcery Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
spe-systemhaus.de 🇩🇪
SPE Systemhaus GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
smallsoft.de 🇩🇪
smallSoft GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.