Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to felixmenard.com

Félix Ménard · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
arina-romanova.com
Arina Romanova · Senior product designer
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
artemtoderian.com
Artem Toderian — Product Design Partner
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
booleanra.com
Let's build - Boolean Ra⚪Foundry
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
6ev.io
Derek Barnett | Product
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
pixlapps.com
Pixl Apps - Marcel Schmidt Portfolio of UX and Product Design & Development Work
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
anhdangdesign.com
ANH DANG DESIGN – Product Design & Development
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
planetstudio.com
Home - Planet Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
softraxa.com
Softraxa — Product & Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
neworks.co.uk 🇬🇧
Neworks | Digital Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
bengribbin.dev
Ben Gribbin — product engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
intensemagenta.com
intensemagenta - ux design
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
artassoiants.com
Art Assoiants · Psychology-trained builder
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
interactivethings.com
Interactive Things: Data Visualization & User Experience Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
newlandh2o.com
Newland H2O – Research and Development in water conscious-design
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
robertsens.com
Robert Sens - Digital Product Designer & Team Leader, NYC
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
rolfpiechura.com
Rolf Piechura | Experience Design
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
rosedaledesigns.com
Rosedale Designs Inc.
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
robotwilliams.com
Rob W - Creative Developer & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.